Editorial Policy | Independence & Objective Research

1. Content Independence Statement

Our primary duty is to our users. FundedTradingRules.com maintains strict editorial independence. The presentation, ranking, and description of prop trading firms and their rules are determined solely by our editorial team's objective analysis of their terms, conditions, and offerings. We do not allow firms to pay for favorable ratings or to alter our presentation of their actual rules.

2. How Affiliate Relationships Work

To keep this site free, we partner with some of the prop trading firms listed on our site through affiliate programs. When you click a link and purchase an evaluation, we may earn a commission. However, these relationships never dictate our editorial content, rule verification process, or our firm comparisons. We list firms based on user interest and market relevance, regardless of whether we have an affiliate agreement with them.

3. Error Correction Process

We take accuracy seriously. Given the dynamic nature of prop firm rules, errors or outdated information may occasionally appear. Once an error is identified—either internally or via community reports—we verify the correct information against official firm documentation. Corrections are implemented promptly across the site.

4. Review and Complaint Handling

We review the terms and conditions of prop trading firms to extract objective rules. We do not act as an arbitrator for individual user complaints or disputes with firms. If multiple verified sources or a significant volume of credible complaints indicate a firm is acting in bad faith or violating their stated terms, we reserve the right to add a warning to their profile or remove them from our platform entirely.

5. Contact for Editorial Concerns

If you have questions about our editorial process, believe our content lacks objectivity, or need to escalate a concern about a firm's representation, please contact us. We aim to address editorial concerns within 48-72 business hours.